Anti-Gun Group Begins “Brew Not Bullets” Starbucks Boycott

More of the anti gun BS !!!!
God deliver us from do-gooders such as CEO Fineman

Time to stop by Starbucks and get my ground coffee then to the sporting goods store and get some more ammo.

Fineman is an idiot! Maybe he should read the whole constitution instead of just the first amendment. Perhaps he needs his ADHD meds!

I’m going to have to buy $tarbuck$ $tock tomorrow! Don’t these anti-gunners realize how many gun owners are in this country and how we support any pro-gun business????????? I live in a very small town with four coffee shops…one of them being a $tarbuck$ right off the freeway and the other three locally-owned.
Until tomorrow, I’ve always supported the locally owned…now they’ll just have to share me!
THANKS $TARBUCK$!!!!!!!

Yep, time for more starbucks coffee. Think i’ll start taking my .357 with me. Just in case one of those anti-gun freaks goes postal!!!

I will SUPPORT STARBUCKS to the end as long as they don’t tread on me. SUPPORT THE CONSTITUTION and the SECOND AMENDMENT.

THANK YOU STARBUCKS for standing your ground. Support the Second Amendment.

When going to Starbucks you should always order double. If you would order one cup of coffee and sit to drink it, order two even if you don’t drink them both. If they support us we should support them. THANK YOU STARBUCKS !

The best humor is the big anti leader in New York. Look at every time he is in public, he has at least 2 heavily armed guards beside him in camera. And more in the wings. Hates guns so bad he surrounds himself with them.

Must visit Starbucks more often.

They have no business trying to force their demands on anyone. Who died and left them to be God? Since when do they have any right or responsibility to order a public or private business to have or not have a “policy”? Starbucks has no policy, and that is fine, because that right is guaranteed by the Constitution. This bunch of yo-yos can go pound sand.

Good for Starbucks. If we had a Starbucks in the small town where I live I would go by and buy something as well. I do drink coffee but I am not a fan of their particular coffee. Starbucks committing to be an Aggressive Corporate Advocate for sane gun laws according to this IDIOT,” NGAC CEO Elliot Fineman would be to for them abide by this IDIOTS demands and more than likely a large loss of business. Fortunately the CEO of Starbucks has a pretty good head on his/her shoulders and recognizes that MORE & MORE gun laws don’t amount to a hill of beans (no pun intended) if the so called advocates of gun laws can’t get the goverment to enforce the laws already on the books. So what good are more & more gun laws for?? This IDIOT Fineman wants ONE thing and thing ONLY, for the government to take away EVERYBODYS guns so when the time comes that the government decides they can take control and control everybody no one will be armed to stand against the TYRANNICAL GOVERNMENT that resides in Washington now! Good for you Starbucks! Hang tough! We will support you!

KUDOS STARBUCKS!

I will pick up my Double Espresso today…

Nothing like being jacked up on caffeine when one of these clowns accosts you in the parking lot!

There are over 200 million rifles, shotguns and handguns in the public’s possession. We also know that 2/3 of the 16,137 murders in the US in 2004, were caused by guns and over ½ of 401,326 violent crimes were done with the aid of a gun.

Meanwhile firearms have had a special place in this country’s history, and the Second Amendment to the US Constitution states: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” But because of a history of violence, especially in the decade of the Depression, pressure was exerted on the Federal government to control guns, and the Firearms Act of 1934 banned silencers and sawed off shotguns. There are also laws regulating the ownership of machine guns, and heavy military ordinance.

Many in this part of the country see the NRA as an industry lobby that is only interested in promoting gun sales, and therefore benefiting by being the beneficiary of large contributions from these gun manufacturers. Obviously, given the fact that Wayne LaPierre makes almost $900,000 per year and the NRA hierarchy lives quite well, one could draw the conclusion that the Second Amendment is almost meaningless as a “basic right” but more used as a tactic to rile up hunters and gun enthusiasts to raise money to protect the gun producers.

One could guess that the average citizen, who does not want to carry a gun, would be fearful for their lives. In other words, they would be forced to carry a firearm to be competitively safer. It sort of reminds me of the track runner who in a climate of zero drug de-regulation would be forced to use performance-enhancing drugs to compete, or he/she would be at a substantive disadvantage!

Of course some supporters of the NRA claim that an armed public could prevent the totalitarian overthrow of the United States government. They also state cite that Hitler had confiscated all the guns in Germany, and if the Jews had even a small fraction of the gun ownership that is in the US today they would have been much more able to protect themselves from arrest and deportation. But on the other hand the Russian revolt of 1905 and the Revolution of 1917 came about because the generally unarmed public had guns because of the Russo-Japanese War and WWI.

When an Islamic terrorist attacks these unarmed MORONS in a public place, and an armed NRA member or OFF DUTY policemen who are allowed to carry weapons kills the S.O.B., they going to KISS YOUR BUTT TO THANK YOU! ARMED JIHADESTS are already here!
THANKS TO OBUMMER LETTING THEM COME HERE!

The gun lobby lands on mushier ground, however, when it leaps from such / examples into a far broader argument: that more lives are saved than lost by the firearms Americans acquire to protect themselves and their property. The N.R.A. emphasized that claim in a two-page newspaper advertisement attacking TIME for its report ((July 17)) on 464 gun deaths that occurred in the U.S. in a single week, chosen at random. “Legally-owned firearms saved the lives of far more Americans than those lost during ((TIME’s)) ‘seven deadly days,’ ” the advertisement stated. “According to noted criminologist Dr. Gary Kleck of Florida State University, every year some 650,000 Americans use firearms to thwart criminal assault. That’s 12,500 a week.”

Even Paul Blackman, research coordinator for the N.R.A., concedes that the advertisement “stretches the data.” He adds, “I don’t know of any criminological study that has tried to quantify the number of lives saved based on the number of guns that were successfully used for protection.”

Kleck says his study did not consider the question of lives saved. Nor did he conclude, as the N.R.A. claims, that a crime or an assault had been “thwarted” in each of his estimated 645,000 (the ad upped it to 650,000) annual instances of a protective use of a gun. Kleck notes that his study may have included incidents in which a homeowner merely heard noisy youths outside his house, then shouted, “Hey, I’ve got a gun!” and never saw any possible attacker.

Still, Kleck estimates that an assailant or the defender actually fired a handgun in nearly half the cases. If so, 322,000 incidents each year involved great danger, and the potential victims credited their guns with protecting them. That is about ten times the number who die from guns annually in the U.S. “It is possible that guns save more lives than they cost,” Kleck says.
His numbers are based on a 1981 poll conducted by Peter D. Hart Research Associates. It asked 1,228 U.S. voters whether in the previous five years any member of their household had “used a handgun, even if it was not fired, for self-protection or for the protection of property.” Roughly 4% (about 50 people) said they had done so. Projecting that percentage onto the number of U.S. households in the five years covered by the poll (1976-81), Kleck came up with the estimate that handguns had been used protectively 3,224,880 times, or 645,000 a year. Comparing that with surveys that included rifles and shotguns, he estimated that all types of guns are used defensively about a million times a year.

Is his analysis valid? “I certainly don’t feel very comfortable with the way he’s used the data,” says Hart Research president Geoffrey Garin. While Kleck based his findings on the Hart survey, his analysis of the circumstances under which guns were used came from other studies. Protests Garin: “We don’t know anything about the nature of the instances people were reporting.” Says William Eastman, president of the California Chiefs of Police Association, about the Kleck conclusions: “It annoys the hell out of me. There’s no basis for that data.”
There is far more research on the question of who is most likely to get killed when someone keeps a gun at home. In a 1986 study called “Protection or Peril?,” Dr. Arthur Kellermann, a University of Tennessee professor of medicine, and Dr. Donald Reay, chief medical examiner of King County in Washington, concluded that for each defensive, justifiable homicide there were 43 murders, suicides or accidental deaths. Out of 398 gunshot fatalities in homes in King County between 1978 and 1983, only nine were motivated by self- defense.

The one-week survey by TIME found a similar ratio on a national basis: only 14 of the 464 gun deaths resulted from defensive firing. An alarming 216 were suicides, 22 were accidental, and many of the rest involved homicides among people who knew each other well rather than citizens gunned down by strangers. Such statistics do not refute the argument that a gun, even if not fired, can save a life by discouraging a murderous attacker. Still, Tulane sociologist James Wright points out that guns have limited usefulness in preventing crimes. About 90% of crimes in homes occur when the resident is away, he notes, while violent crimes often take place on the streets. Says Wright: “Unless you make a habit of walking around with your gun at all times, you’re not going to stop that either.”

A relatively balanced view of the gun question comes, surprisingly, from Kleck. “The vast majority of the population lives in low-crime neighborhoods and has virtually no need for a gun for defensive reasons,” he says. “A tiny fraction has a great deal of reason to get anything it can get that might help reduce its victimization.” Even the American Rifleman accounts of how helpful a gun can be in saving a life may not always tell the full story. In the case of cabdriver Bolton, the N.R.A. magazine failed to report how chance, rather than her pistol, saved her life. Bolton told the Arizona Republic that after she wounded her assailant, he grabbed her gun, pushed the barrel against her neck and pulled the trigger several times. What really saved Bolton was that she had emptied the chamber. Said she: “I kept thinking that maybe there was a bullet still in it and it would go off at any minute.” If that had happened, the incident undoubtedly would not have appeared in the Rifleman.

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,152446,00.html#ixzz1iKQbpaDG

Having never been in a Starbucks, it is probably a good time to go. just to show my support against the Libs that want it their way. By the way for all you anti Gun Libs, this isn’t Burger King. You don’t get it your way. Be seeing you shortly Starbucks and thank you libs. I always wanted to try a Starbucks just never had the right motivation

we haven’t been in a Starbucks for a couple of years but will start using them again.
Wow, and are their hq still in Washington state? maybe we still have hope

Since when is it a business owner’s responsibility to choose which laws they will support and which they won’t? Aren’t these anti-gun nuts asking businesses to usurp the law, which they have no right to do in the first place? Don’t you dare touch my natural right to carry my weapon. Good for you Starbucks for standing your ground! So, which law should be usurped next? Think about that for a while.

I love these anti-gun people. Many of them support a woman’s right to murder an innocent unborn child that has no guilt, but won’t allow a woman the natural right to protect herself and her living children from a guilty criminal. As a woman, I choose to exercise my Second Amendment right…freedom of choice to carry my .9mm and if I have to use it someday to kill, it won’t be used on an innocent person.

We Indiana Gun Owners support you, Starbucks! Stand your ground!! Many of us stopped into your shops yesterday to support you and will continue to choose your business over any of those business who don’t make a stand to support the LAW, now or in the future.

What is up with this “Posting to quickly” error? I can’t get my message posted…tried 4 times..maybe 5th is the charm?

Do these people have a clue! What! lets have someone take my rights away! Get a clue people! 2nd amend. Runs threw my veins over my dead body! Maybe everyone here should live in Brazil! Then there tone will change… Goto toRio for a month get a taste of it.

I have never bought a Starbucks coffee, but I am going to now just to give them support for their stance regarding this issue. All concealed carry people should give them some extra business for their support.

All of these idiot anti-gunners are victims waiting to happen!!

Let’s hope Starbucks sticks to it’s guns, so to speak!

Ramblein from a cranky old man.
I will visit Starbucks more often and let them know why. I go armed because I am unable to retreat very fast, I will not back down from some subhuman float-sum unless I am with loved ones that harm may come to. I will do my best to remove the float – sum’s genes from the gene pool by violating his culture of feeding off humanity with retroactive birth control.
I believe an armed society is a polite society
The Jews for the preservation of firearms say dial 911 and die. It has been upheld in court that the police do not have an obligation to protect you only to protect society
. I am not the police. I do have an obligation to protect my family loved ones and fellow human beings.
I ignore the no fire arm signs posted unless I have to go through a metal detector. Then I try to check my gun. It is comical to watch the one manning the detector’s action when you ask where do I check my gun. So far I have had to return to my vehicle and secure my gun.

What absolute pussies! I hope the next time one of them gets into trouble, they call a cop that doesn’t have a gun.

These Nazi enemies of the Constitutions should remember one thing. They will make for good target practice for both sides when America’s Second Civil War begins.All obama has to due is send his jack booted SS brown shirt to citizens home to collect their guns & gold and he will hear the first shots of the Civil War. Hope me and my family are out of here by then. I don’t believe these intitled socialist scum bag Americans are worth fighting for .Let them burn. They want it .Let them suffer.

Write a letter of support to Starbucks today……..Then, have a cup of Starbucks coffee!

Who are these trouble makers and who is backing them? Follow the money.

Three cheers for gun bans.

No other laws have created more murders in “gun free zones”.

EVERY school shooting is a DIRECT RESULT of banning guns in specific areas.

I do not intend to spend time in areas where the criminal has a FREE FIRE ZONE where I cannot defend myself and others.

Kudos to Starbucks!! It’s truly refreshing and encouraging to see a story about someone NOT knuckling under on some idiotic policy some looney lefty dunce is whining about. I think I’ll head over to the nearest Starbucks to show my appreciation and enthusiastic support with my few remaining discretionary dollars!

NGAC has just sold another cup of Starbucks coffee!! How’s that for your idiotic boycott?!?

The Data clearly shows when Citizens Concealed Carry crime goes down dramatically. Every Law abiding Citizen should carry a Gun. The criminals are scared to death of armed Citizens, and so is the Liberal/Communist/Democrats and the Government on the whole…!!! They also know that the Military are our son’s and daughter’s and they won’t fire on American Citizens. I have spoken with many serves men and they have made it clear that if Obama tried to order them to attack American Citizens they would revolt. For one it’s against the Constitution they swore to uphold…!!! God Bless Gun Carrying Americans!

“Sane gun laws”? There is no such thing as a sane gun law. Rightfully speaking EVERY gun law on the books is a violation of the 2nd Ammendment. I guess these people have a hard time understanding “shall not be infringed” just like some people don’t know the difference between an ILLEGAL citizen and a LEGAL citizen.

Starbucks was on the list of businesses to avoid as they were anti-firearms. The fact that they simply follow the laws does not change that. They used to give funds to anti-firearms groups. I don’t know if they still do.

Regardless of the corporate attitude on firearms, it does not mean that the franchisees adhere to an anti-firearms agenda. They should be judged on their individual merits and not punished by those who disagree with the corporate policy pro or con. They are simply trying to run a business, serve their customers, and make a living.

“Those who beat thier guns into plowshares will plow for those who don’t”-Thomas Jefferson.A man who is ,and was smarter than the people on this site.I have a question for you Mrrigarfunkel.What makes you think that you are smarter thanm any one else.Is it because you read a few more books than anyone else?Or read biased publications that print slanted views and statistics?You seem to take great pleasure in pooh-poohing other peoples beliefs,from religon to the Constitution.Why?Do you have some direct line to the AllMighty?..If you are an astute studier of history,either world or American,you will see that your views in many cases are flawed..Our forefathers were immensley more intelligent than your self,and much more truthful and honest.You have an arrogance that goes beyond common sense,so you must be a liberal.Nothing wrong with being a liberal,it’s your right.But you should start respecting opposing views,.whether you agree with them or not.I don’t like your views,but I respect them…I spent 21 months of combat in the Viet Nam war,so I am asking that you repect me.As in the 60′s and 70′s,this country is on the verge of civil war,what you do not understand is that the people you laud,will be the ones coming for you and your family,friends and relatives.Not the people on this site,but the people frtom the government. do not know if there are fema camps,or private armies,or even if there are foriegn troops being trained on our soil,to repress the people,but it has happened before,and as Santanyana said,”those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it”.We have been warned by our founding fathers to NOT trust our government,that is why we have the second amendment to the Constitution.Also,the Declaration of Independence mandates that we remove a tyrannical government,by any means necessary.Has it become necessary?Perhaps.But your elitist attitude does not help the debate,just fans the flames.But perhaps that is your intention.I don’t know who said it,but it makes sense,”opinions are like ass-holes,every one has got one

Be nice if all the anti-gun folks would put a sign on their homes stating the fact that they oppose guns. Robbers would know right where to start. What idiots.

Here we have a little, pissant, outfit trying to pick out a business they think they can harm with a meaningless boycott. In the mainstream of the liars and fact ignoring world of anti gun nuts, these people are not even a wet weather creek.
They are shouting to the anti gun world like a two year old — Look at me, Mommy ! Look at me !
The people that want to buy a $ 5 to $ 7 cup of coffee will do so anyway. ———————-
What a bunch of maroons ! ! (credit to Bugs Bunny)

NGAC stands for “gun victims action council”. The people they represent are the criminals who have been injured or killed during the criminal act they were committing. Hey, somebody has to stand up for the criminals in NObama’s “social fairness” anthill.

I am yet to hear about any law abiding citizen that carries a gun, shooting any unarmed person. Even if that were to happen the police hold the record for shooting unarmed people and innocent victims. The fact of the matter is once you succumb to a police state and ternary, you give up all freedoms. If this knucklehead were ever in a situation where he was at gunpoint. He would realize the futility of his argument.
In 1992 I was a cab driver and was stabbed 6 times. I shot my attacker with my gun. Had I not had my gun I would be dead. Fact of the matter is, if someone wants to commit violent crimes, they do not care about gun laws. They would have complete run of our streets and victimize people allot more. I live in Arizona and we have no gun laws. Everyone has the right to conceal without a permit or open carry. Gun crimes have dropped dramatically since it became law. Tell Mr. Lineman to STFU. The only people shooting people here are cops and gang members.

Good for Starbucks! I normally drink regular coffee will have to give them a try when there’s one in my area.

Bravo Starbucks. I don’t often go there but I will now make a point of going more often. Alas living in California it won’t be as safe as other states but I can still support the company.

Gasoline is rising to four dollars a gal. by the end of April…Gasoline has jumped about ten percent so far this year….Looks like these higher prices’ are going to be long- term so doesn’t it make sense our option is to “DRILL in OUR COUNTRY” ??? My question , what is Obama , Senate ,Congress doing about this” HUGE PROBLEM” ? Obama says ” NO ” to the pipeline in Canada which will create thousands of jobs let alone accomplish a start of independence oil supply than depending on other countries { that do not like us very much }. Could it be Obama does not want to cut off” HIS “supply of contributions to his campaign from Unions, Environmentalist, Banks, Rich oil Co., etc. this is all about money, power ?? It does not matter to these people in Washington about the oil supply & the price of gas because we pay for their travel, airplanes, autos ,etc. the middle class Americans are suffering from this robbery !

Obama says of his $3.8 trillion Budget, “we can not just cut our way into growth “, WHY NOT OBAMA” ???? STOP THE DAMN SPENDING !! We have not seen any growth in this country since you took office…” STOP THE WASTEFUL STIMULUS FUNDING “to the very rich which you benefit with” MILLIONS” of campaign money…Stop lying about JOBS, you know it & we know there are” NO GROWTH”, you need to count the thousands & thousands that are no longer looking for jobs & are no longer getting unemployment,” QUIT BULL SH>>TING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE” with your lies !! You say we can not cut, lies, lies, because the news this AM says you are cutting the defense to the extent it is very, very “DANGEROUS” plus other cuts like MEDICAID< MEDICARE<SOCIAL SECURITY{ the Republicans are up in air about & fighting it} so what about that ??? We are very disappointed with Leon Penneta, looks like he is one of your regime, another one that is taking this country down, if not he would resign & tell you to go to ," YOU KNOW WHERE"!! Why haven't you work with the other side?? Why, because you think you are "KING" and you can do as you please, well think again as it does not work that way, we the people have the say, you all in Washington are our employees , we hired you at the voting booth { WHICH WAS A BIG MISTAKE IN 08 } & we Americans decided to "FIRE YOU & YOUR REGIME IN 2012" so start packing !! You & your family have lived off of us Americans long enough with our money, we are fed up & not taking any more of your"DICTATORSHIP"…this is the "LAND OF THE FREE" & we intend to keep it that way!! "GOD BLESS AMERICA, OUR MEN & WOMEN IN HARMS WAY" !!!

This is an excerpt from a secret directive of the liberal hierarchy:

There are a few gun control groups, or cells as they are referred to strategically, that are so secret most of us haven’t heard of them. One that has been very active on the assault weapons campaign is called Fellowship of Liberals Obediently Castigating Kalashnikovs (FLOCK). FLOCK uses a technique common among those who levy political war, called Swill Happily the Elixir the Empire Pours (SHEEP). This cell is connected to the technique by an ancient directive called Obliterate Freedom (OF). Together, this cell, directive, and technique are known as FLOCK OF SHEEP.

FLOCK OF SHEEP would have been successful had it not been for a very troublesome band of freedom fighters called NRA (Never Relinquish America). So it is the duty of all participants in the political war being levied by the liberal cult to attack the NRA liberally.

Let me suggest that the CEO of the National Gun Victims Action Council (NGAC), who is so opposed to Americans retaining the right of self defense, that he consider the following facts. First of all any American has the legal right to self defense. Police are not always handy when a criminal threatens you with serious bodily injury or death, so just maybe Mr. Elliot Fineman should consider the the fact that the average police response time to a 911 call is roughly 14 minutes, whereas the average response time of a .357 magnum is just a little in excess of 1300 ft. per second. Which one does he want defending his wife and family? I’m over being barraged by these so called “do-gooder” pseudo altruistic liberal lemmings wanting to tell the rest of us in this country how we should live our lives. I don’t intrude on his civil liberties, so I would suggest to him that he stay the hell away from mine!! If he would rather not carry a firearm so be it, the second amendment doesn’t say he has to, only that he has the right too. If in his perverted little mind he thinks by banning guns from Starbucks that the criminal element will somehow then shy away from their stores seem just a “wee bit” naive. These progressive extremists are all to quick to assume the alleged “moral high ground” when it comes to their view of our rights, when in fact it is not his, nor his Messiah in Washington, that gave us those rights. I put it to him that they came from a constitution that has treated the people of this country pretty well for over 230+ years. I know he, and the likes of such illustrious Supreme Court Justices as Ruth Bader Ginsberg or Sonia Sotomayor, who believe that our founding document is antiquated and needs to be “updated”. In the minds of true patriotic Americans most prefer to accept that document as the rock solid foundation for our entire system of government and way of life. If it is so repulsive to him maybe he should consider Saudi Arabia, Libya, Syria, or the like where you don’t have to worry about such minutia as civil liberties and/or personal freedoms. In fact if history teaches us anything about what happens to a people who are disarmed by their government, then maybe we should remember the same thing happened in pre- WW II Germany for instance. My response to Mr. Fineman would be to find some other cause to glorify and pay homage to, thereby somehow giving meaning to his life. He needs to climb down off his self serving pedestal and join the real world, which still believes in the constitutional rights of American citizens!!

Didn’t Hitler confiscate all guns from German towns (along with books that were burned in the village sqares) prior to his holocaust atrocities? It would be awful to have a Muslim infiltrator in our White House as a high-ranking authority who might want to do the same thing prior to our country’s holocaust (destroying our Constitution and freedoms), wouldn’t it? One-world government, one-world religion, etc. Vote this party OUT completely.

Cowboybite, why does it say all my comments are awaiting moderation?

Another example of the few deciding that they have the right to dictate to the majority. As for the Resident, I have never said President when referring to him. I have and will continue to call him Odumbo.

There’s many organizations, that are totally against guns!
To each I pose only one Question:

“Why is it, that in ALL states with very many and I mean many ANTI-GUN LAWS, they are also the one year after year with highest crime rates esp murders, why? ”

It seem all these ANTI GUNNERS, are really for MORE CRIMES ESPECIALLY VIOLENT CRIMES?
What say YOU?

Anti-guns groups are so stupid that they have no clue as to why they have the freedom to stand around bitching about guns! If it were not for guns that win our freedom through military victory they would be dead or enslaved by now!

If Starbucks supports the “NRA’s lethal Pro-Gun Agenda,” then Mr. Fineman supports murder, rape, genocide, and other such horrific crimes. They’re both inflammatory and unqualified statements to promote an agenda – neither of which I believe.

The fact is, Starbucks made a business decision to serve customers (ie., to make money), and, at worst, chose the path of least resistance – that is, to allow the Constitution and local law determine who a law abiding Citizen is, and to respect the Citizen’s rights and personal choices within that definition.

Considering some of Starbucks’ past decisions (particularly the 9/11 debacle, which really angered me as both a Citizen and retired veteran), this one has redeeming qualities; and while I might visit Starbucks once or twice a year, I’ll support their stand on this issue.

Just for the sake of argument, I wonder if Mr. Fineman has a personal security team, and are they armed? Given his exposure as an inflammatory activist, I would tend to think so, and I would hope that our tax dollars don’t pay the bill; meaning, he shares the typical double standard of most anti-gun zealots…

After reading what most have to say, it’s difficult to believe obama’s polls have risen. Certainly hope all of you folks, Garfunkel excepted, are representative of the voting public!

look what happend to his grandma she was going to tell that he was born in somallya no she is dead cant tell no one, he sure dont belong in the white house unless he is there to clean the rest rooms.

I’m a huge lib and I don’t drink coffee but I really will have to patronize Starbucks now. That policy sounds so rational it’s opposition it truly confusing.

I hate to get off topic but all those racist anti Obama rants really don’t help your cause. I keep reading about his anti-gun agenda in the Rifleman but I still have not seen it.

Thank you Starbuck for not knuckling under to the ransom demands of the NGAC. If we don’t stop these anti-American fringe groups now, coffee may be next on their agenda.

I don’t go to Starbucks because I really don’t like their coffee. Now I WILL go just to support their gun views. More people need to get armed and learn how to use their weapon. When the government is only legal carriers of guns, we the citizens are in a whole lot of trouble.

After reading this article and checking out the web page of the National Gun Victims Action Council I joined the NRA. The National Gun Victims Action Council crowed on their site that the NRA would never defeat their boycott because they outnumber them in members by 50 to 1.

Idiots being stupid and ignorant.
Sure they have a right to protest and stuff.
But these ignorant people are too stupid to read a book and see what a disarmed populace has done to them.
If they don’t like the policy of gun rights that Starbucks offers, then they should leave.
Go start a new chain that the progressive left would love.
You know. They can call it the Empires coffee emporium.
You have the right to free speech as long as everyone agrees with it.
You have no right to self defense, you must use dial a prayer (9/11).
The store will reserve the right to strip search you at any given time.
The use of internet will allow them rights to you computer and any info.
Protests will be squashed with overly violent police.

I quit Starbucks years ago because of their support of the gay agenda. I find it LOL funny that a bunch of LEFT-wing-nuts want to boycott Starbucks, but I’m sure Starbucks will cave, as they do for every group in the loony-left/Islamofascist unholy alliance.

I am off to the NEAREST Starbucks to get some brew!! and I have never been to a Starbucks before. I will also tell those at the counter why.

This is basically very simple…if you don’t like Starbucks restrictions…don’t buy their coffee…go to Dunkin Donut!!!!!! For the love of heaven….who cares!!!!!!